Volume 8, Issue 4 (December 2021)
Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2021, 8(4): 209-218 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Khosravi Z, Shahisadrabadi F, Rahmatinejad P. Exploring the Role of COVID-19 Pandemic on
Religious and Spiritual Experiences of Iranian
Population: A Phenomenological Study. Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2021; 8 (4) :209-218
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-444-en.html
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-444-en.html
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2- Department of Consuling, Faculty of Humanities, Branch Fatemeh Alzahra, Yazd Farhangian University, Yazd, Iran.
3- Department of Psychiatry Nekuei Hedayati Forqani Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. ,rahmatinejadp@yahoo.com
2- Department of Consuling, Faculty of Humanities, Branch Fatemeh Alzahra, Yazd Farhangian University, Yazd, Iran.
3- Department of Psychiatry Nekuei Hedayati Forqani Hospital, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. ,
Abstract: (1202 Views)
Background and Objectives: The spread of COVID-19 has led to numerous changes in
different domains of life throughout the world, including health habits, jobs, consumption
patterns, lifestyles, and religious ceremonies. Phenomenological questions, religious challenges,
and many questions regarding the cause of the pandemic also resulted from these changes.
Therefore, the goal of the present study was to explore the role of the COVID-19 pandemic on
the religious and spiritual experiences of the Iranian population.
Methods: A qualitative design based on a phenomenological approach was used. The sample
included 18 subjects who were selected using a purposeful sampling method. The data were
collected using semi-structured interviews.
Results: The Colaizzi method was used to analyze the data and member checking, selfmonitoring,
and immersion were used to examine the credibility of the results. The study
findings included 175 primary codes, of which two main categories and 11 subcategories were
extracted. Belief in God and religion was the first category extracted that included the following
subcategories: no change in belief in God, no change in lack of belief in God, reconsidering one’s
own beliefs, amazed by the power of God, amazed by the knowledge of God, Expecting miracles
from God, and Increased sense of spirituality or closeness to God. The second category was
beliefs about existence that included the following subcategories: no change in Beliefs, believing
that human abilities are limited, thinking about existence, and believing in the importance of
changing our behavior towards nature.
Conclusion: According to the study result, the experience of COVID-19 had affected
participants’ attitude towards religion, spirituality, God, nature, and the system of the world; most
of the participants reported improvements in their previous beliefs and attitudes as a result of
these changes. Therefore, some conversations, such as the epidemic of a disease (COVID-19)
can affect the religious attitudes and beliefs of individuals.
different domains of life throughout the world, including health habits, jobs, consumption
patterns, lifestyles, and religious ceremonies. Phenomenological questions, religious challenges,
and many questions regarding the cause of the pandemic also resulted from these changes.
Therefore, the goal of the present study was to explore the role of the COVID-19 pandemic on
the religious and spiritual experiences of the Iranian population.
Methods: A qualitative design based on a phenomenological approach was used. The sample
included 18 subjects who were selected using a purposeful sampling method. The data were
collected using semi-structured interviews.
Results: The Colaizzi method was used to analyze the data and member checking, selfmonitoring,
and immersion were used to examine the credibility of the results. The study
findings included 175 primary codes, of which two main categories and 11 subcategories were
extracted. Belief in God and religion was the first category extracted that included the following
subcategories: no change in belief in God, no change in lack of belief in God, reconsidering one’s
own beliefs, amazed by the power of God, amazed by the knowledge of God, Expecting miracles
from God, and Increased sense of spirituality or closeness to God. The second category was
beliefs about existence that included the following subcategories: no change in Beliefs, believing
that human abilities are limited, thinking about existence, and believing in the importance of
changing our behavior towards nature.
Conclusion: According to the study result, the experience of COVID-19 had affected
participants’ attitude towards religion, spirituality, God, nature, and the system of the world; most
of the participants reported improvements in their previous beliefs and attitudes as a result of
these changes. Therefore, some conversations, such as the epidemic of a disease (COVID-19)
can affect the religious attitudes and beliefs of individuals.
Type of Study: Original Article |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2021/05/26 | Accepted: 2021/10/27 | Published: 2022/05/31
Received: 2021/05/26 | Accepted: 2021/10/27 | Published: 2022/05/31
References
1. Peteet JR. COVID-19 anxiety. J Relig Health. 2020; 59(5):2203-4. [DOI:10.1007/s10943-020-01041-4] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1007/s10943-020-01041-4]
2. Duan L, Zhu G. Psychological interventions for people a-ected by the COVID-19 epidemic. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020; 7(4):300-2. [PMID] [DOI:10.1016/S2215-0366(20)30073-0]
3. Sun L, Sun Z, Wu L, Zhu Z, Zhang F, Shang Z, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of acute posttraumatic stress symptoms during the COVID-19 outbreak. J Affect Disord. 2021; 283:123-9. [DOI:10.1101/2020.03.06.20032425] [DOI:10.1101/2020.03.06.20032425]
4. Qiu J, Shen B, Zhao M, Wang Z, Xie Y. A nationwide survey of psychological distress among Chinese people in the COVID-19 epidemic: Implications and policy recommendations. Gen Psychiatry. 2020; 33:e100213. [DOI:10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213] [DOI:10.1136/gpsych-2020-100213]
5. Hawryluck L, Gold WL, Robinson S, Pogorski S, Galea S, Styra R. SARS control and psychological effects of quarantine, Toronto, Canada. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004; 10(7):1206-12. [DOI:10.3201/eid1007.030703] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.3201/eid1007.030703]
6. DiGiovanni C, Conley J, Chiu D, Zaborski J. Factors influencing compliance with quarantine in Toronto during the 2003 SARS outbreak. Biosecur Bioterror. 2004; 2(4):265-72. [DOI:10.1089/bsp.2004.2.265] [PMID] [DOI:10.1089/bsp.2004.2.265]
7. Jeong H, Yim HW, Song YJ, Ki M, Min JA, Cho J, et al. Mental health status of people isolated due to Middle East Respiratory Syndrome. Epidemiol Health. 2016; 38:e2016048. [DOI:10.4178/epih.e2016048] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.4178/epih.e2016048]
8. Cann A, Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG, Kilmer RP, Gil-Rivas V, Vishnevsky T, et al. The Core Beliefs Inventory: A brief measure of disruption in the assumptive world. Anxiety Stress Coping. 2010; 23(1):19-34. [PMID] [DOI:10.1080/10615800802573013]
9. Segal RA. Weber and Geertz on the meaning of religion. Religion. 1999; 29(1):61-71. [DOI:10.1006/reli.1998.0178] [DOI:10.1006/reli.1998.0178]
10. Sinding Bentzen J. Acts of god? Religiosity and natural disasters across subnational world districts. Econom J. 2019; 129(622):2295-321. [DOI:10.1093/ej/uez008] [DOI:10.1093/ej/uez008]
11. Belloc M, Drago F, Galbiati R. Earthquakes, religion, and transition to self-government in Italian cities. Q J Econom. 2016; 131(4):1875-926. [DOI:10.1093/qje/qjw020] [DOI:10.1093/qje/qjw020]
12. Rezaeian, M. Muslim world's universities: Past, present and future. World Family Medicine Journal: Incorporating the Middle East. 2016; 14(7):39-41. [DOI:10.5742/MEWFM.2016.92859] [DOI:10.5742/MEWFM.2016.92859]
13. Pocock L, Rezaeian M. Medical education and the practice of medicine in the Muslim countries of the Middle East. World Fam Med J. 2016; 14(7):28. http://www.mejfm.com/September%202016/MedEd.htm [DOI:10.5742/MEWFM.2016.92858]
14. Smith JA. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods. New York: Sage Publications; 2007. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Qualitative_Psychology/D5xHYpXVDaAC?hl=en&gbpv=0
15. Antonovsky A. Unraveling the mystery of health. How people manage stress and stay well. New York: Wiley; 1987. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Unraveling_the_Mystery_of_Health/6HAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0&%20well
16. Antonovsky A, Sourani T. Family sense of coherence and family adaptation. J Marriage Fam. 1988; 50(1):79-92. [DOI:10.2307/352429] [DOI:10.2307/352429]
17. Eriksson M. Salutogenesis. In: Michalos A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and well-being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. 2014. [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3445] [DOI:10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3445]
18. Eriksson M, Lindström B. Antonovsky's sense of coherence scale and the relation with health: a systematic review. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2006; 60(5):376-81. [DOI:10.1136/jech.2005.041616] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1136/jech.2005.041616]
19. Bonanno GA. Loss, trauma, and human resilience: Have we underestimated the human capacity to thrive after extremely aversive events? Am Psychol. 2004; 59(1):20-8. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.59.1.20]
20. Koenig H, Koenig HG, King D, Carson VB. Handbook of religion and health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2012. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Handbook_of_Religion_and_Health/NiRZcCVbkZ4C?hl=en&gbpv=0
21. Pargament KI, Koenig HG, Perez LM. The many methods of religious coping: Development and initial validation of the RCOPE. J Clin Psychol. 2000; 56(4):519-43. [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:43.0.CO;2-1]
https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:4<519::AID-JCLP6>3.0.CO;2-1 [DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(200004)56:43.0.CO;2-1]
22. Koenig HG. Religion and mental health: Research and clinical applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science; 2018. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Religion_and_&gbpv=0
23. Alcorn SR, Balboni MJ, Prigerson HG, Reynolds A, Phelps AC, Wright AA, et al. If God wanted me yesterday, I wouldn't be here today": Religious and spiritual themes in patients' experiences of advanced cancer. J Palliat Med. 2010; 13(5):581-8. [DOI:10.1089/jpm.2009.0343] [PMID] [DOI:10.1089/jpm.2009.0343]
24. Bentzen JS. In crisis, we pray: Religiosity and the COVID-19 pandemic. J Econ Behav Organ. 2021; 192:541-83. [DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.014] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.014]
25. Pargament KI. The psychology of religion and coping: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Guilford Press; 1997. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Psychology_of_Religion_and_Coping/oVcfyQEACAAJ?hl=en
26. Simoni JM, Marton MG, Kerwin JF. Spirituality and psychological adaptation among women with HIV/AIDS: Implications for counseling. J Couns Psychol. 2002; 49(2):139-47. [DOI:10.1037/0022-0167.49.2.139] [DOI:10.1037/0022-0167.49.2.139]
27. Gutek GL. Philosophical and ideological perspectives on education [MJ. Pakseresht, Persian trans]. Tehran: SAMT Publication; 2019. http://opac.nlai.ir/opac-prod/search/briefListSearch.do?=_title&sortKeyValue2=sortkey_author
28. Folkman S, Moskowitz JT. Positive affect and the other side of coping. Am Psychol. 2000; 55(6):647-54. [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647] [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.647]
29. Pargament KI, Hahn J. God and the just world: Causal and coping attributions to God in health situations. J Sci Study Relig. 1986; 25(2):193-207. [DOI:10.2307/1385476] [DOI:10.2307/1385476]
30. Tedeschi RG, Calhoun LG. Posttraumatic growth: Conceptual foundations and empirical evidence. Psychol Inq. 2004; 15(1):1-18. [DOI:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01] [DOI:10.1207/s15327965pli1501_01]
31. Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Posttraumatic growth: The positive lessons of loss. In: Neimeyer RA, editor. Meaning reconstruction and the experience of loss. Massachusetts: American Psychological Association; 2001. [DOI:10.1037/10397-008] [DOI:10.1037/10397-008]
32. Calhoun LG, Tedeschi RG. Handbook of posttraumatic growth: Research and practice. Oxford: Taylor & Francis; 2014. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Handbook_of_Posttraumatic_Growth/BHEABAAAQBAJ?hl=en&gbpv=0 [DOI:10.4324/9781315805597]
33. Dawkins R. The blind watchmaker. London: Penguin; 2006. https://www.google.com/books/edition/The_Blind_Watchmaker/zHc9PgAACAAJ?hl=en [DOI:10.1142/9789812832061_0004]
34. Heidegger M. Poetry, language, thought. New York: HarperCollins; 2001. https://www.google.com/books/edition/Poetry_Language_Thought/GUn3aVw-4MsC?hl=en
35. World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Manifesto for a healthy recovery from COVID-19: Prescriptions and actionables for a healthy and green recovery [Internet]. 2020 [Updated 2020 May]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications-detail-redirect/who-manifesto-healthy-recovery-covid19
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
Owned by Qom University of Medical Sciences
Published by Qom University of Medical Sciences Press
eISSN: 2383-3610
pISSN: 2322-4304
Email: j.hsme[at]muq.ac.ir
spirituality14[at]gmail.com
