Volume 9, Issue 1 (March-2022 2022)                   Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2022, 9(1): 1-10 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Qorbanpour Lafamajan A, qorbanpoorlafmejani, H, khosropanah, A. Ethics in Freud’s Theory and Its Comparison With Ethics From the Perspective of Islam. Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2022; 9 (1) :1-10
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-425-en.html
1- Department of Educational Sciences and Counseling, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran., Department of Educational Sciences and Counseling, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, 5 km, Tehran Road, Guilan Province
2- Department of Quran Science and Hadith, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran., Department of Theology (Quran and Hadith) , Faculty of Literature and Humanities, University of Guilan, 5 km, Tehran Road, Guilan Province , ghorbanpoor1363@guilan.ac.ir
3- Department of Philosophy, Research Institute for Islamic Culture and Thought, Tehran, Iran, Professor of the Institute of Islamic Culture and Thought
Abstract:   (1511 Views)
Background and Objectives: Psychology needs to study ethics as an important dimension
of human personality. The present study aims to critique the moral foundations of Freud's
theory based on Islamic ethics.
Methods: This is a review study. We used library and internet studies, and the resources
related to the subject were extracted and studied.
Results: According to Freud, ethics results from internalizing parental and social values and
relative, masculine, illogical, and irrational matters. A human being is morally neutral. The
criterion for moral behavior is to follow the moral standards of parents or the community.
On the contrary, according to Islam, man is not morally neutral but has a spiritual morality.
Part of morality is introduced by nature and intellect, and the other is introduced by religious
teachings. Islamic morality is absolute and is not subject to the tastes of individuals or social
conventions, and its audience is a kind of human being. Proximity to God is the criterion for
evaluating moral behaviors, and to achieve this goal, both the appearance of the behavior and
the motivation of the doer must be good and divine.
Conclusion: The most important critique of Freud’s moral view from the perspective of Islamic
morality is to ignore the innate moral capacities of man, consider moral matters as irrational,
relativize moral propositions, limit morality to masculinity, and pay attention to the appearance
of moral behaviors and ignore the role of intention in the formation of moral behaviors.
Full-Text [PDF 925 kb]   (885 Downloads) |   |   Full-Text (HTML)  (320 Views)  
Type of Study: Review Article | Subject: General
Received: 2021/03/2 | Accepted: 2022/04/5 | Published: 2022/03/9

References
1. Herman WE. Values acquisition and moral development: An Integration of Freudian, Eriksonian, Kohlbergian and Gilliganian viewpoints. Paper presented at: The Oxford Round Table. 1-30 Jul 200; Oxford: England. [link]
2. Karimi N, Kazemi M, Aghayari S, Madah karani SZ. [Investigating the process of moral development from the perspective of cognitive evolution (Persian)]. Paper presented at: The third National Conference in honor of Suhrawardi on the Subject of Applied Ethics; 3 October 2012: Zanjan; Iran. [Link]
3. Lotfabadi H. [Critique of the theories of moral development of Piaget, Kohlberg and Bandura and presenting a new model for research on the moral development of Iranian students (Persian)]. Q J Educ Innovations. 2005; 4(11):79-107. [Link]
4. Ellemers N, Van Der Toorn J, Paunov Y, Van Leeuwen T. The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2019; 23(4):332-66. [DOI:10.1177/1088868318811759] [PMID] [PMCID] [DOI:10.1177/1088868318811759]
5. Javidan F, Dehqan M, Shamsi Gooshki E, Abbasi M. [Analysis of Kohlberg›s theory of moral development with a Quranic approach (Persian)]. Akhlagh-e Zisti. 2016; 2(6):11-48. [Link]
6. Mosaviasl SM, Azarbaijani M, Alizadeh SM. Psychology of Ethics. Qom: Seminary and University Research Institute; 2019.p.9-12.
7. Popov LM, Ustin PN. Psychological alienation problem in moral and ethical psychology of personality. Int Electron J Math Educ. 2016; 11(4):787-97. [Link]
8. Walsh RT. Introduction to ethics in psychology: Historical and philosophical grounding. J Theor Philosophical Philos. 2015; 35(2):69-77. [DOI:10.1037/teo0000015] [DOI:10.1037/teo0000015]
9. American Psychological Association (APA). Revision of ethical standard 3.04 of the "Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct" (2002, as amended 2010). Am Psychol. 2016; 71(9):900. [DOI:10.1037/amp0000102] [PMID] [DOI:10.1037/amp0000102]
10. Karimi Y. [Social psychology (Persian)]. Tehran: Arasbaran Publishers; 2015. [Link]
11. Sunar D. The psychology of morality. Online Read Psychol Cult. 2018; 2(1):1-16. [DOI:10.9707/2307-0919.1012] [DOI:10.9707/2307-0919.1012]
12. Alawīnizhād SH. [Psychology and ethics different interpretations of soul (Nafs) and differences in ethical approach (Persian)]. Quranic Researchers. 2013; 18 (72):104-33. [Link]
13. Koenane ML. Towards an ethical recontextualisation of Freud›s theory of personality. Phronimon. 2014; 15(1):1-5. [DOI:10.25159/2413-3086/2209] [DOI:10.25159/2413-3086/2209]
14. Qorbanpoor Lafmejani AQ. The human in the perspective of Freud and its comparison with the Shiite Islam perspective. Technium Soc Sci J. 2020; 4:84-93. [DOI:10.47577/tssj.v4i1.65] [DOI:10.47577/tssj.v4i1.65]
15. Karimzadeh S. [Psychological mechanisms of the process of internalization of moral values (Persian)]. Ravanshenasi Va Din. 2010; 3(2):5-28. [Link]
16. Cavanna D, Velotti DC. Ethics in psychoanalysis: From the classical model to the implication of "moral pact". In: Cipolletta S, Gius E, editors. Ethics in action: Dialogue between knowledge and practice. Milan: LED Edizioni Universitarie; 2013. [Link]
17. Maluschke G. Validity of moral norms: Perspectives of philosophy and psychoanalysis. Interam J Psychol. 2007; 41(2):205-14. [Link]
18. Fleming JS. Piaget, Kohlberg, Gilligan, and others on moral development. Psychol Perspect Hum Dev. 2005; 7:1-25. [Link]
19. Qorbanpoor Lafmejani A. Lawrence Kohlberg's theory of moral development and its comparison with ethics from the perspective of shia Islam. Eur J Sci Theol. 2019; 15(1):97-112. [Link]
20. Juami R, Kosasih, A, Hakam, K. Value education through ethical dialectics in Freud›s psychoanalysis paradigm - on deutsch language intensive class program. Paper presented at: 2nd International Conference on Sociology Education (ICSE 2017); 4 October, 2017; Bandung: Indonesia. [DOI:10.5220/0007101405200525] [DOI:10.5220/0007101405200525]
21. Shafiabadi A, Naseri Gh. [Theories of counseling and psychotherapy (Persian)]. Tehran: University Publishing Center; 2003. [Link]
22. Schilling L E. Perspectives on counseling theories. Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall; 1984. [Link]
23. Saatchi M. [Theories of counseling and psychotherapy (Persian)]. Tehran: Virayesh Publication; 2004. [Link]
24. Wallwork E. Psychoanalysis and ethics: Ernest Wallwork. London: Yale University Press; 1991.[DOI:10.12987/9780300159691] [DOI:10.12987/9780300159691]
25. Sharf RS. Theories of psychotherapy and counseling concepts and cases. [M. Firoozbakht, Persian trans]. Tehran: Rasa; 2001. [Link]
26. Sagan E. Freud, women, and morality: The psychology of good and evil. New York: Basic Books; 1988. [Link]
27. Tabarsi F H. Makarem al-Akhlaq [E. Bagheri, Persian trans]. Tehran: Farahani; 1989. [Link]
28. Khosropanah, A. [New theology: An Islamic approach (Persian)]. Qom: Maaref Publication; 2011. [Link]
29. Khosropanah, A. [Islamic Humanology (Persian)]. Qom: Maaref Publication; 2016. [Link]
30. Shirvani A. [Islamic ethics (Persian)]. Qom: Darolfekr Publication; 2003. [Link]
31. Mesbah MT. [Critique of ethical schools (Persian)]. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educationaland Research Institute Publication; 2005. [Link]
32. Mesbah MT. [Ethics in Quran (Persian)]. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Publication Center; 2012. [Link]
33. Mesbah MT. [Courses in philosophy of ethics (Persian)]. Tehran: Etelaat Institute; 2002. [Link]
34. Abutorabi A. [Criticism of normality criteria in psychology with an attitude towards Islamic sources (Persian)]. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Publication; 2007. [Link]
35. Khavas A, Hossaini A, Dabiri A, Sharifi HA, Pakpoor A, Islami MT. Ethics with special consideration of education. Qom: Maaref publication; 2009.p.130-134.
36. Dabiri A. [Philosophy of ethics with an educational approach (Persian)]. Qom: Maaref Publication; 2013. [Link]
37. Mesbah MT. [The philosophy of morality (Persian)]. Qom: Maaref Publication; 2013. [Link]
38. Hossainzadeh M. [An introduction to epistemology and fundamentals of religious knowledge (Persian)]. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Publication; 2012. [Link]
39. Fathali M. [Man, way and understanding the guide (Persian)]. Qom: Imam Khomeini Educational and Research Institute Publication; 2005. [Link]
40. Gharaviyan M. [Philosophy of Ethics (Persian)]. Qom: Darolfekr Publiccations; 2007. [Link]
41. Niazkar F, Diba H. [Gender and morality in Ayat Allah Javadi Amoli's view (Persian)]. Revelatory Ethics. 2016; 5(11). [Link]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2025 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb