دوره 6، شماره 2 - ( 3-1398 )
جلد 6 شماره 2 صفحات 57-52 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Karimi N. Principles of Compensation for the Transfer of Infectious Body Products in Islamic Jurisprudence. Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2019; 6 (2) :52-57
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-293-fa.html
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-293-fa.html
کریمی نسرین. Principles of Compensation for the Transfer of Infectious Body Products in Islamic Jurisprudence. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics. 1398; 6 (2) :52-57
گروه فقه و مبانی حقوق اسلامی، واحد قم، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، قم، ایران ، nasrinkarimi@qom-iau.ac.ir
چکیده: (3457 مشاهده)
Background and Objectives: Careers related to body products are targeted toward saving patients from certain death. Such careers serve a necessary and important role. In case of the incidence of any human fault and organizational failure within the irreparable course of body product manufacturing, the negligent person is liable to pay compensation according to the principle of Tasbeeb (causation). Althoughno negligence has occurred in almost all cases, in case of incidence, it is impossible to prove. Regarding this, the present study aimed to find a good solution to vindicate the rights of patients under such circumstances.
Methods: The review study was conducted using the library recourse for data collection.
Results: If infectious products are transferred directly, the conductor does not need to have committed the fault to prove liability according to the principle of Itlaf (wasting). On the other hand, if causes involved in the transfer of products are found to have committed a the fault, their liability can be proved under the principle of Tasbeeb.
Conclusion: When the causing agents involved in the transfer of products have not committed a the fault, or their fault is not proved, the principle of Ghorur (deception) will be a good solution that protects the deceived victims. Patients who trust a wide and complex organization and its equipment, which is solely responsible for the important task of transferring the body products, and refer to it with confidence, are actually deceived by its appearance, and this brings about the means of deception rule to be enforced.
Methods: The review study was conducted using the library recourse for data collection.
Results: If infectious products are transferred directly, the conductor does not need to have committed the fault to prove liability according to the principle of Itlaf (wasting). On the other hand, if causes involved in the transfer of products are found to have committed a the fault, their liability can be proved under the principle of Tasbeeb.
Conclusion: When the causing agents involved in the transfer of products have not committed a the fault, or their fault is not proved, the principle of Ghorur (deception) will be a good solution that protects the deceived victims. Patients who trust a wide and complex organization and its equipment, which is solely responsible for the important task of transferring the body products, and refer to it with confidence, are actually deceived by its appearance, and this brings about the means of deception rule to be enforced.
فهرست منابع
1. Jabouri YM. Al-Wajiz fi Sharh al-Qanun al-Madani al-Urdoni. Oman: Dar al-Vesaghe; 2003. p.213.
2. Mahyar R. Arabic-persian Abjadi Dictionary. Tehran: Islamic publications; 1989. p. 11.
3. Ibn Manzur M. Lisan al-Arab. Vol. 9. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Arabi; 1987. p. 18.
4. Tarihi F. Majma' al-Bahrain. Vol. 5. Beirut: Dar Ihya al-Turath al-Din; 1995. p. 30.
5. Holy Quran.
6. Ibn Idris Helli M. Al-Sara'ir al-Hawi al-Fatawi. Vol.3. qom: Islamic Publications Institute related to Society of Seminary Teachers of Qom; 1989. p. 32.
7. Al Kashif al-Ghita' MH. Tahrir al-Majallah (A commentary on Ottoman civil Code). Vol. 1. Tehran: Library of Murtazavi; 1980. p. 107.
8. Musavi Khumeini SR. Bada'i' al-Dur fi Qa'ida nafy al-Zarar. Qom: Institute for compilation and publication of Imam Khomeini's works; [n.d.]. p. 65.
9. Husseini Sistani SA. Qa'ida la zarar va la Zirar. Qom; Mehr Press; 1993. p. 113.
10. Makarim Shirazi N. Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyya. Vol. 1. Qom: Imam amir al-Mu'mineen School; 1989. p. 55.
11. Iraqi A. Qa'ida la zarar.Islamic Propagation Office of Qom Seminary School; 1997. p. 138.
12. Musawi Bujnurdi SH. Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyya. Vol. 1. Qom: al-Hadi Publications; 1998. p. 188.
13. Tabatabaie Yazdi SMK. Commentary on al-Makasib. Vol. 2. Qom: Isma'iliyan Ins.; 1997. p. 37.
14. Akhund Khorasani MK. Kifayat al-Usul. Vol. 2. Qom: Al al-Bayt Ins.; 1988. p. 268.
15. Mamaqani A. Commentary on Thesis of la zarar. Published at the end of Nihayat al-Maqal Takmilat Ghayat al-Amal. Qom: al-Zakha'ir al-Islamiyya; 1971. p. 332.
16. Iraqi A. Principle of no harm. Qom: Office of Islamic Propagation in Qom Seminary Schools; 1997. p. 138.
17. Sadr SMB. Qa'ida la zarar wa la Zirar. [s.l.] ; [n.d.] . p. 206.
18. Sistani SA. Minhaj al-Salihin. Qom: Setareh; 1994. p. 113.
19. Na'inee MH. Minyat al-Talib fi Sharh al- Makasib. Vol. 2. Qom: Heydari Press; [n.d.]. p. 294.
20. Musawi Bujnurdi SM. Qawa'id Fiqhiyya. Tehran: Uruj Press Ins.; 2000. p. 141.
21. Farahidi Kh. Kitab al-'Ayn. Vol. 4. Tehran: Manshurat Dar al-Hijrah; 1989. p. 346.
22. Khuzi S. Vol. 2. Qom: Manshurat Maktabah Ayatullah Najafi; [n.d.]. p. 866.
23. al-Qayyumi A. Al-Misbah al-Munir. Vol. 2. Qom: Dar al-Kutub al-'Ilmiyya; [n.d.]. p. 608.
24. Naraqi M. Mustanad al-Shi'a. vol. 14. Mashhad: Al al-Bayt Ins.; 1998. p. 296.
25. Muhaddith Bahrani Y. Al-Hada'iq al-Nazirah fi Ahkam al-"Itrat al-Tahirah. Vol. 18. Qom: Islamic Publications Office related to Society of Seminary Teachers; 1984. p. 394.
26. Muvahhedi Fazil Lankarani M. Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyya. [s.l.]; [n.d.]. p. 225.
27. Mustafavi SMK. Ma'at Qa'idah Faqih. Qom: al-Nashr al-Islami Ins.; [n.d.]. p. 178.
28. Musawi Bujnurdi SH. Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyya. Vol. 1. Qom: al-Hadi Publications; 1998. p. 269-80.
29. Husseini Shirazi SM. Al-Fiqh. Beirut: Dar al-Ulum; 1988. p. 100.
30. Maragheiee MF. Al-'Anavin al-Fiqhiyya. Vol. 2; Qom: Society of Seminary Teachers Publications; 1996. p. 441.
31. Tabatabie Yazdi AMK. Commentary on Makasib. Qom: Isma'iliyan Ins.; 1997. p. 180.
32. Zera'at A. Principles of Civil Jurisprudence. Tehran: Jungle Publications; 2009. p. 124.
33. Abdullahi A. Principles of Jurisprudence. Qom: Bustan Kitab Ins.; 2009. p. 226.
34. Muhaqqiq Damad SM. Qa'id Fiqh (civil section). Tehran. Center for Islamic Science publications; 2004. p. 170.
35. Musawi Bujnurdi SH. Al-Qawa'id al-Fiqhiyya. vol.1. Qom: al-Hadi Publicat
ارسال پیام به نویسنده مسئول
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
