دوره 6، شماره 2 - ( 3-1398 )
جلد 6 شماره 2 صفحات 44-38 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Mianehsaz E, Sehat M, Moravveji S A, Shojaei Far H, Tabatabaee S M. Assessment of Professionalism in Medical Residents from the Perspective of Interns in Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2017. Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2019; 6 (2) :38-44
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-276-fa.html
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-276-fa.html
صحت مجتبی، مروجی سیدعلیرضا، شجاعی فر حمیدرضا، طباطبایی سیدمحمدرضا. Assessment of Professionalism in Medical Residents from the Perspective of Interns in Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2017. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics. 1398; 6 (2) :38-44
1- گروه پزشکی اجتماعی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان
2- گروه پزشکی اجتماعی،
3- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان،
4- گروه طب اورژانس،
2- گروه پزشکی اجتماعی،
3- دانشگاه علوم پزشکی کاشان،
4- گروه طب اورژانس،
چکیده: (3813 مشاهده)
Background and Objectives: Professionalism includes behaviors, actions, and goals that determine the professional level of an individual. The assessment of the professionalism of learners can help to estimate and determine educational needs and priorities, as well as further interventions. As future faculty members and experts, residents play an important role in the practical education of behavior and scientific commitment of medical students. Therefore, for the first time, this study aimed to evaluate the professionalism of residents from the perspective of interns.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 138 interns at Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2017. The research tool was the Persian and edited version of the 15-item questionnaire designed by the American Board of Internal Medicine for the evaluation of professionalism. The mean and standard deviation were estimated related to total scores of professionalism and three domains of excellence, honor/integrity, as well as altruism/respect. Moreover, the relationship between reported scores and demographic characteristics was determined.
Results: Out of 150 distributed questionnaires, 138 questionnaires were analyzed in this study. The total score and three domains of excellence, honor/integrity, and altruism/respect were estimated at 6.07±1.53, 4.24±1.87, 6.56±2.03, and 6.83±1.73, respectively.
Conclusion: In total, the professionalism of residents was moderate from the perspective of interns. Among the three assessed domains, the lowest and highest scores were related to the domains of excellence and altruism/respect, respectively. The low score of excellence reminded the absence of residents as role models. With respect to the hidden educational curriculum and its impact on the formation of professional behavior of students, it seems crucial to plan in this regard.
Methods: This cross-sectional study was performed on 138 interns at Kashan University of Medical Sciences in 2017. The research tool was the Persian and edited version of the 15-item questionnaire designed by the American Board of Internal Medicine for the evaluation of professionalism. The mean and standard deviation were estimated related to total scores of professionalism and three domains of excellence, honor/integrity, as well as altruism/respect. Moreover, the relationship between reported scores and demographic characteristics was determined.
Results: Out of 150 distributed questionnaires, 138 questionnaires were analyzed in this study. The total score and three domains of excellence, honor/integrity, and altruism/respect were estimated at 6.07±1.53, 4.24±1.87, 6.56±2.03, and 6.83±1.73, respectively.
Conclusion: In total, the professionalism of residents was moderate from the perspective of interns. Among the three assessed domains, the lowest and highest scores were related to the domains of excellence and altruism/respect, respectively. The low score of excellence reminded the absence of residents as role models. With respect to the hidden educational curriculum and its impact on the formation of professional behavior of students, it seems crucial to plan in this regard.
فهرست منابع
1. Aramesh K, Mohebbi M, Jessri M, Sanagou M. Measuring professionalism in residency training programs in Iran. Med Teach. 2009;31(8):356-61. Link [DOI:10.1080/01421590802638022]
2. American Board of Internal Medicine. Project professionalism. Philadelphia, PA: American Board of Internal Medicine; 1995. Link
3. Ghaffari F. A perspective of medical ethics and patients' rights according to Iranian and Islamic traditional medicine texts. Med Hist. 2010;2(4):11-45. [Persian] link
4. http://abimfoundation.org/what-we-do/physician-charter. Link
5. Egan EA, Parsi K, Ramirez C. Comparing ethics education in medicine and law: combining the best of both worlds. Ann Health Law. 2004;13:303-25. Link
6. Kelly AM, Gruppen LD, Mullan PB. Teaching and Assessing Professionalism in Radiology Resident Education. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(5):563-73.Link [DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2017.02.004]
7. Kiani M, Bazmi S. Teaching medical ethics in Iran: A quantitative study. J Med Educ. 2016;15(3):124-36. Link
8. Lashkari M, Beigzadeh A. The concept and challenges of medical professionalism. Report of Health Care. 2015;1(1):39-41. Link
9. Papadakis MA, Arnold GK, Blank LL, Holmboe ES, Lipner RS. Performance during internal medicine residency training and subsequent disciplinary action by state licensing boards. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(11):869-76. Link [DOI:10.7326/0003-4819-148-11-200806030-00009]
10. Papadakis MA, Teherani A, Banch MA, Knettler TR, RattnerSL, Stern DT, et al. Disciplinary action by medical boards and prior behavior in medical school. N Engl J Med. 2005;353:2709-11. Link [DOI:10.1056/NEJMsa052596]
11. Epstein RM, Hundert EM. Defining and assessing professional competence. JAMA. 2002 9;287(2):226-35. Link [DOI:10.1001/jama.287.2.226]
12. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Web site http://www.acgme.org/. Accessed May 6, 2016. Link
13. Nemani VM, Park C, Nawabi DH. What makes a "great resident": the resident perspective. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014;7(2):164-7. Link [DOI:10.1007/s12178-014-9210-6]
14. Malakoff GL, Payne CL, Staton LJ, Kolade VO, Panda M. Accounting for professionalism: an innovative point system to assess resident professionalism. J Community Hosp Intern Med Perspect. 2014;4. Link [DOI:10.3402/jchimp.v4.23313]
15. Yamani N, Changiz T, Adibi P. Professionalism and hidden curriculum in medical education. 1st ed. Isfahan: Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. [Persian]
16. Bryan RE, Krych AJ, Carmichael SW, Viggiano TR, PawlinaW. Assessing professionalism in early medical education: experience with peer evaluation and self-evaluation in the gross anatomy course. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2005;34:486-91. Link
17. DeLisa JA, Foye PM, Jain SS, Kirshblum S, Christodoulou C. Measuring professionalism in a physiatry residency training program. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(3):225-9. Link [DOI:10.1097/00002060-200103000-00015]
18. Ahadi T, Mianehsaz E, Raissi G, Moraveji SA, Sharifi V. Professionalism in residents of physical medicine and rehabilitation in Iran. J Med Ethics Hist Med. 2015;8:3. Link
19. Askarian M, Ebrahimi Nia MJ, Sadeghipur F, Danaei M, Momeni M. Shiraz medical students' perceptions of their colleagues' professional behavior. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2015;3(3):111-6. Link
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
