دوره 6، شماره 1 - ( 12-1397 )
جلد 6 شماره 1 صفحات 17-11 |
برگشت به فهرست نسخه ها
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghorbani R, Khormaie F. Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Virtue of Wisdom: The Mediating Role of Patience. Health Spiritual Med Ethics 2019; 6 (1) :11-17
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-229-fa.html
URL: http://jhsme.muq.ac.ir/article-1-229-fa.html
Relationship between Big Five Personality Traits and Virtue of Wisdom: The Mediating Role of Patience. Health, Spirituality and Medical Ethics. 1397; 6 (1) :11-17
چکیده: (4846 مشاهده)
Background and Objectives: Patience and wisdom are highly respected moral virtues in Islamic culture. The former (patience) is of utmost importance in the Islamic religion and the latter (wisdom) is one of the six basic virtues both in the recent classification of positive psychologists and Islamic-Iranian culture. These moral virtues are considered important in individuals’ wellbeing and can have significant social and personal consequences on the mental health of people. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between personality traits and the virtue of wisdom with regard to the mediating role of patience.
Methods: A total of 440 BSc students studying at Shiraz University participated in the present study. They included 281 females and 159 males selected through random cluster sampling method. The participants were asked to complete the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (Webster), Big five personality questionnaire (Goldberg), and patience Scale (Khormaei et al).
Results: The results of structural equation modeling showed that the data fitted the model. Moreover, the findings indicated that agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism could indirectly predict wisdom through the mediating role of patience.
Conclusion: On the basis of the results, it could be concluded that personality traits could improve wisdom in students through the mediating role of patience. Considering the fact that patience can be taught, it is recommended that efforts should be dedicated to teaching moral virtues to students to bring wisdom to young people.
:
Methods: A total of 440 BSc students studying at Shiraz University participated in the present study. They included 281 females and 159 males selected through random cluster sampling method. The participants were asked to complete the Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale (Webster), Big five personality questionnaire (Goldberg), and patience Scale (Khormaei et al).
Results: The results of structural equation modeling showed that the data fitted the model. Moreover, the findings indicated that agreeableness, conscientiousness, and neuroticism could indirectly predict wisdom through the mediating role of patience.
Conclusion: On the basis of the results, it could be concluded that personality traits could improve wisdom in students through the mediating role of patience. Considering the fact that patience can be taught, it is recommended that efforts should be dedicated to teaching moral virtues to students to bring wisdom to young people.
:
فهرست منابع
1. 1. Asadi S. Charecteristic of wisdom base on implicit theories. J Posit Psychol. 2015;1(1):51-61. link
2. Comer DR, Sekerka LE. Taking time for patience in organizations. J Manag Devel. 2014;33(1):6-23. Link [DOI:10.1108/JMD-11-2013-0132]
3. Khormaei F, Farmani A, Sultani E. The patience scale: Instrument development and estimates of psychometric properties. J Educ Meas. 2015;17:50-67. [Persian] link
4. Schnitker SA, Emmons RA. Patience as a virtue: religious and psychological perspectives. Res Social Sci Study Relig. 2007;18:177-207. link [DOI:10.1163/ej.9789004158511.i-301.69]
5. Schnitker SA. An examination of patience and well being. Posit Psychol. 2012;7(4):263-80. link [DOI:10.1080/17439760.2012.697185]
6. Yamagata S, Suzuki A, Ando J, Ono Y, Kijima N, Yoshimura K, et al. Is the genetic structure of human personality universal? A cross-cultural twin study from north american, europe, and asia. Person Social Psychol. 2006;90:987-98. link [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.987]
7. Aghababaei N, Tabik MN, Hatami J. Relationship of Patience to Personality, Mental Health and life Satisfaction. Appl Psychol Res Q. 2014;5(2):17-28. [Persian] link
8. Khormaei F, Farmani A, Sultani E. Investigating the Prediction Role of Patience as a Moral Construct and Personality Characteristics in the Hopelessness of University Students. Med Ethic. 2015;11:21-32. [Persian] link
9. Walsh R, Reams J. Studies of Wisdom: A special issue of integral review. Integl Rew. 2015;11(2):1-6. link
10. Webster J. Wisdom and positive psychosocial values in young adulthood. Adult Development. 2010;17:70-80. link [DOI:10.1007/s10804-009-9081-z]
11. Kunzmann U, Baltes PB. The psychology of wisdom: Theoretical and empirical challenges. In RJ, Jordan J. (Eds), A handbook of wisdom: Psychological perspectives. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
12. Krause N, Hayward RD. Virtues, practical wisdom and psychological well-being: a christian perspective. Soc Indic Res. 2015;122(3):735-55. link [DOI:10.1007/s11205-014-0709-4]
13. Glück J, König S, Naschenweng K, Redzanowski U, Dorner L, Straber I. How to measure wisdom: content, reliability, and validity of five measures. Front Psychol. 2013;4:405. link [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00405]
14. Lecturer SR. Five factors of personality and wisdom. Prog Educ. 2009;2:82-6. link
15. Levenson MR, Jennings PA, Aldwin CM, Shiraishi RW. Self-transcendence: Conceptualization and measurement. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2005;60(2):127-43. link [DOI:10.2190/XRXM-FYRA-7U0X-GRC0]
16. Kline RB. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. (3rd Ed). New York, London: The Guilford Press; 2011.
17. Webster JD. An exploratory analysis of a self-assessed wisdom scale. Adult Dev. 2003;10(1):13-22. link [DOI:10.1037/t06580-000]
18. Webster JD. Measuring the character strength of wisdom. Aging Hum. 2007;65:163-83. link [DOI:10.2190/AG.65.2.d]
19. Cheraghi F. Conceptealize of wisdom based on factor structuare study. Unpublished doctoral [dissertation]. Tehran: kharazmi University; 2015. [Persian]
20. Goldberg LR. The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychol Assess. 1992;4:26-42. link [DOI:10.1037/1040-3590.4.1.26]
21. Khormaei F, Farmani A. Investigation psychometric characteristics short form big five personality. Psychol Models Methods. 2014;4(16):29-32. [Persian] link
22. Steel P. The nature of procrastination: A met analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(1):65-94. link [DOI:10.1037/0033-2909.133.1.65]
23. Barrick MR, Mount MK, Judge TA. Personality and performance at the beginning of the new millennium: What do we know and where do we go next? Int J Select assess. 2001;9:9-30. [DOI:10.1111/1468-2389.00160]
24. Laidra K, Pullmann H, Allik JR. Personality and intelligence as predictors of academic achievement: A cross - sectional study from elementary to secondary school. Pers Individ Dif. 2008;42:441-51. link [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2006.08.001]
25. Adebayo SO. Eysenckian dimensions of Personality and morality: An operationalisation of possible Relationships Pakistan. Soc Sci. 2007;4(1):32-8. link
26. Brown S. Learning across the campus: How college facilitates thedevelopment of wisdom. J Coll Stud Dev. 2004;45(2):134-44. link [DOI:10.1353/csd.2004.0020]
| بازنشر اطلاعات | |
 |
این مقاله تحت شرایط Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License قابل بازنشر است. |
